Sensor Analysis for Pool Cleaning Robots: Why LiDAR Faces Challenges and Vision Holds Promise

Created on 10.12

Sensor Analysis for Pool Cleaning Robots: Why LiDAR Faces Challenges and Vision Holds Promise​​

The quest for reliable navigation and obstacle avoidance is central to the development of autonomous pool cleaning robots. While various sensing technologies are considered, this analysis evaluates the applicability of LiDAR and vision systems based on fundamental physical and practical constraints.

​​The Problem with LiDAR in Water​​

At first glance, LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) seems like a logical choice for precise mapping. However, its application in an aquatic environment is fraught with significant challenges, making it currently unsuitable for consumer pool robots.

​​1. The Fundamental Physics of Light in Water​​

The core issue lies in the behavior of light in water. Unlike in air, light underwater is subject to severe attenuation caused by four key phenomena: refraction, reflection, scattering, and absorption. These effects distort laser beams, degrade signal integrity, and drastically reduce effective range. This inherent physical unreliability is the primary reason traditional infrared (IR) LiDAR, common in terrestrial robots like robotic vacuums, is ineffective underwater.

​​2. The Limitations of Blue-Green LiDAR​​

To overcome water's absorption of IR light, some companies have developed LiDAR systems using blue-green light, which has better penetration in water. While this is a step in the right direction, two major hurdles remain:

Safety and Liability Concerns: Blue-green light is within the visible spectrum. Deploying a powerful visible laser in a consumer product, especially one used in a recreational environment like a swimming pool, introduces non-trivial risks. The potential for accidental exposure, leading to claims of eye injury or damage to other equipment, presents a substantial liability. Regulatory landscapes, particularly in North America and Europe, impose severe penalties for consumer products that cause harm, making this a critical consideration.
Performance in Real-World Conditions: The advertised performance of blue-green LiDAR is often achieved in ideal conditions with very low water turbidity. In a typical residential pool, where water clarity can vary, the effective sensing range may drop to just 1-2 meters. At this limited range, the cost-benefit ratio becomes unfavorable when compared to more robust and cost-effective alternatives like ultrasonic sensors.

​​Conclusion on LiDAR:​​ Given the fundamental physical limitations, significant safety liabilities, and performance constraints in real-world pool environments, LiDAR—both IR and blue-green—is not a viable solution for mainstream pool cleaning robots at this stage.

​​The Strategic Potential of Vision Systems​​

From a first-principles perspective, computer vision emerges as a more promising long-term pathway for pool robot navigation and targeted cleaning.

Vision systems aim to mimic the way a human would assess a pool's condition. By using cameras and advanced algorithms, a robot can potentially identify specific types of debris, locate waterline grime, and navigate with contextual awareness. Major industry players like Maytronics, Aiper, and Beabot are already investing in vision-based R&D, signaling a clear trend.

Admittedly, the technology is still maturing. The primary technical challenge is underwater visual navigation, which is complicated by the lack of distinct visual landmarks on uniform pool walls and floors. However, even before solving the complete navigation problem, vision systems can offer immediate, high-value applications for specific cleaning tasks that are less dependent on precise localization.

​​Conclusion​​

In summary, while LiDAR's path is blocked by fundamental physical and practical barriers, vision technology presents a more adaptable and strategically sound direction for the evolution of pool cleaning robots. It may not be a complete solution today, but its potential for intelligent, context-aware cleaning makes it a more viable and interesting field for future development. For the foreseeable future, ultrasonic sensors and vision-assisted functionalities likely offer a more practical and safer sensor fusion approach.

Contact

Leave your information and we will contact you.